In any event, the United States Congress had a different
take on Taiwan's future, passing the Taiwan Relations Act "to declare that
harmony and strength in space are in the political, security, and financial
interests of the United States, and are concerns of universal concern."
The Act went on to say that it wanted to "clarify that the United States'
decision to establish discretionary relations with the People's Republic of
China is based on the presumption that the status of Taiwan is still up in the
air through peaceful methods."
To aid in averting China's use of force against Taiwan, the
TRA also committed the U.S. to provide Taiwan with any necessary protection
weaponry. The Act was deemed necessary by Congress to repair some of the damage
caused by Carter's withdrawal of the Mutual Defense Treaty, which had kept the
peace for a quarter-century. However, it fell short of fulfilling the Defense
Treaty's ironclad American pledge to come to Taiwan's defense.
The potential opportunity to confirm that kind of solid and
clear U.S. obligation to Taiwan arose when China responded to a U.S. visit by then-President
Lee Teng-hui in 1995 and Taiwan's initially immediate official political
decision in 1996 by terminating rockets toward the island and closing the
Taiwan Strait and the airspace above it to global business. On the main event,
President Bill Clinton dispatched two planes carrying naval battle groups
through the Strait of Hormuz, the first time the U.S. Naval force has crossed
it since Nixon drew out the Seventh Fleet 23 years earlier. China pushed back
vehemently against the invasion into what it deemed Chinese seas. Washington,
rather than simply informing Beijing that the United States and other nations
maintain the right to be there, According to global regulations, stated the
journey was the result of a climate redirection, undoubtedly conceding that
China's approval was necessary.
In December 1995, Chinese officials asked Assistant
Secretary of State Joseph Nye directly what the U.S. would do if China attacked
Taiwan. Rather than invoking and reaffirming the Taiwan Relations Act by
stating that the U.S. will aid Taiwan's self-preservation, Nye said, "We
don't have any idea, and you don't have any clue." It would depend on the
circumstances." A few months later, Taiwan conducted its first immediate
formal political race, and China expressed its displeasure by launching rockets
towards Taiwan, this time from both sides of the island. In addition, Clinton
deployed a transporter battle gathering to the district. This time, however,
Beijing warned that any ships entering the Strait would encounter "an ocean
of danger." (a most loved danger of Northeast Asia Communist systems as
well as the one in Iran). Washington heard the word, and the boats remained out
- both at the time and for the next 10 years.
Only until the Defense Department inspected its Freedom of
Navigation program in 2006 did the U.S. Navy begin sending its ships back
through the Taiwan Strait, over Chinese concerns. After Beijing abruptly canceled
a scheduled altruism United States port visit to Hong Kong in 2007, the Kitty
Hawk fight group returned to Japan via the Strait of Japan. China strongly
condemned the entry, and Admiral Timothy Keating, commander of the United
States Pacific Command, reacted: "We don't need China's permission to
travel through the Taiwan Strait. We shall exercise our free right to section
when the necessity arises - at whatever moment we determine."
The events demonstrate that it isn't simply the island of
Taiwan that is vitally important, but also the Taiwan Strait. Any conflict
across the Strait would have a substantial impact on both marine and commercial
entrances. Assuming China controls both sides of the Strait, it would have a
firm hold on the worldwide flow.
Another facet of Taiwan's security related to its
geostrategic location is its role in humanitarian assistance and disaster
relief, both as a recipient and a supplier of HADR. The Asia-Pacific region is
reliant on some of the world's most disastrous weather and natural disasters.
When Typhoon Morakot hit Taiwan in 2009, the U.S. Seventh Fleet dispatched boats
and planes to assist the Taiwanese people. When the quake and tsunami
devastated Fukushima in 2011, Taiwan promptly despatched salvage organizations
and skilled laborers and was the largest financial backer of Japan's recovery
effort. Whenever the Philippines felt the effects of Typhoon Haiyan in 2013,
Taiwan replied quickly and generously. Taiwan has consistently responded to HADR
is required all over the world, from the 2004 Indonesian tsunami to Haiti's
earthquake tremor in 2010, Western Sahara's dry season in 2013, and other
catastrophic disasters in Asia and beyond.
To summarise, Taiwan's critical significance from a
military, monetary, and humanitarian assistance standpoint is clear, even
though there have been documented periods when U.S. organizations of the two
players appeared to limit it for what they perceived to be the more significant
goal of obliging the Chinese government. Taiwanese citizens, on the other hand,
have given an entirely new dimension to the country's worth to the West since
the 1980s. Taiwan's political opposition, and ultimately its leaders,
understood that after official U.S. strategic relations had shifted from Taipei
to Beijing for the sake of realpolitik, its survival as a genuine autonomous
substance was dependent on moral and political values. Taiwan's methodical
planned transition to a majority-rules system implies that Washington and the
West no longer possessed the easy "pragmatist" argument - that the
Taiwan strategy problem was just a matter of choosing a small, well-disposed
regime or seeking to further build ties with a larger, formerly hostile one. Currently,
Americans and Japanese may regard Taiwan as a moral and political ideal
partner, certainly in contrast to a country governed by the Chinese Communist
Party.
For the same reason, Taiwan has become even more of a thorn
in Beijing's side as an example of popular governance in Chinese society,
destroying the myth that the majority rule government and Confucianism are
incompatible. The expected internal push for political change in China grew
throughout the 1980s, culminating in the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre. Given
the worldwide stakes in Taiwan's fate, the U.S. responsibilities enshrined in
the Taiwan Relations Act took on far more significance for the United States.
0 Comments